MoinMoin: MoinMoinChat/Logs/moin-dev/2006-09-10

2006-09-10T00:40:54  <ThomasWaldmann> xorAxAx: did you find it?
2006-09-10T00:41:00  <xorAxAx> yes
2006-09-10T00:41:25  <xorAxAx> i wonder i didnt find it by searching for comment in hgweb
2006-09-10T00:41:36  <xorAxAx> i think because it simply cuts off any results after the first 5
2006-09-10T00:42:46  <ThomasWaldmann> that search is strange
2006-09-10T00:45:30  <xorAxAx> on the command line, it works better
2006-09-10T07:20:30  <ThomasWaldmann> moin
2006-09-10T23:44:43  <anarcat> i have yet another patch http://moinmoin.wikiwikiweb.de/MoinMoinPatch/IrcParserSpacingTolerance
2006-09-10T23:45:27  <xorAxAx> anarcat: hg export is preferred
2006-09-10T23:45:32  <xorAxAx> but i can apply it in 1.6
2006-09-10T23:46:06  <anarcat> i was wondering if i was at the right place
2006-09-10T23:46:13  <anarcat> i guess that "hg export" means not ;)
2006-09-10T23:46:31  <xorAxAx> place is ok, format is not
2006-09-10T23:46:31  <anarcat> maybe i should setup a crazy dev server or something...
2006-09-10T23:46:38  <anarcat> i was just kidding
2006-09-10T23:46:43  <xorAxAx> see MoinMoin:MoinDev/MercurialGuide :)
2006-09-10T23:46:44  <anarcat> i understand
2006-09-10T23:46:59  <anarcat> yeah, i started working with mercurial because of you guys :)
2006-09-10T23:47:02  <xorAxAx> parfait :)
2006-09-10T23:47:03  <anarcat> nice thing
2006-09-10T23:49:37  <anarcat> so are you adamant about the hg export or can i want for my next patch?
2006-09-10T23:53:29  <anarcat> i guess it would be time for me to really start hacking at moin and make myself a dev server
2006-09-10T23:54:32  <xorAxAx> for the next patch :)
2006-09-10T23:55:06  <anarcat> sweet :)
2006-09-10T23:55:16  <anarcat> too bad mercurial isn't in debian stable
2006-09-10T23:55:20  <anarcat> ... complicates things...
2006-09-10T23:56:06  <anarcat> have you looked at my "nicerheadingids" patch? http://moinmoin.wikiwikiweb.de/FeatureRequests/NicerHeadingIds
2006-09-10T23:56:24  <anarcat> it's only missing Include.py, but i think it is being refactored in 1.6?
2006-09-10T23:56:38  <anarcat> anyways, i guess the patch would need a facelift for 1.6
2006-09-10T23:56:52  <anarcat> and that's disregarding mitsuhiko's mysterious patch :)
2006-09-10T23:58:12  <xorAxAx> yeah. this would have to be done together with the include.py merge
2006-09-10T23:58:19  <xorAxAx> currently, the author is not reachable
2006-09-10T23:58:31  <xorAxAx> mvirkkil: ping
2006-09-10T23:59:26  <anarcat> include.py ... merge?
2006-09-10T23:59:35  <anarcat> i thought the include.py was being *reduced*?
2006-09-10T23:59:57  <anarcat> i loved the way this was approached: include.py shouldn't to TOC